Volume 5, Issue 6, December 2019, Page: 166-173
Research on Reform of Tax-sharing System in the Background of Tax and Charges Reduction
Yang Le, School of Public Finance and Tax, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
Yu Naifu, School of Economics, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China
Received: Oct. 29, 2019;       Accepted: Nov. 18, 2019;       Published: Nov. 22, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190506.15      View  525      Downloads  182
Abstract
Since 2015, Chinese governments at all levels have been advancing high-frequency tax and charges reduction, and the frequency of charges reductions is surprising. China has continuously deepened reform of tax-sharing system, constantly expanding local government power and increasing economic vitality. In order to promote the sustained and healthy development of China's economy, we should maintain a reasonable scale of government charges, adjust the charges range of the central and local governments, and further improve China's fiscal decentralization system and government charges management mechanism. In this paper, it mainly researches two-way interactive effect between financial decentralization and public service charges. The data of 31 provinces in China from 1999 to 2017 was used to construct the simultaneous equations model for financial decentralization and public service charges, and then the empirical test was carried out for the interactive effect between the two with 3sls method. The research results show that there is a positive interaction between financial decentralization and public service charges. That is, the public service charges is decreased with the increase of the degree of financial decentralization. Local governments gain more power, lower fees and promote economic development. The degree of financial decentralization is increased with the decrease of public service charges. Lower fees mean less government intervention in the economy and the degree of decentralization increases. In addition, the effect degree of the control variables related to financial decentralization and public service charges was analyzed in this paper.
Keywords
Financial Decentralization, Public Service Charges, Two-way Interactive Effect
To cite this article
Yang Le, Yu Naifu, Research on Reform of Tax-sharing System in the Background of Tax and Charges Reduction, International Journal of Finance and Banking Research. Vol. 5, No. 6, 2019, pp. 166-173. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190506.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Ma Hongfan. Administrative “zero charge” related to provincial enterprises should be carried out carefully [J]. China Finance, 2017 (19): 45-47.
[2]
Jia Bo. Transfer of Non-tax Revenue & State Governance [J]. Tax Research, 2019 (06): 110-114.
[3]
Li Yonghui & Lin Sen. Research on Non-tax Revenue and Governance of Government [J]. Journal of Jishou University (Social Science Edition), 2018, 39 (01): 56-63.
[4]
Wang Jiajie, Tong Jinzhi and Li Xing. Tax Competition, Fiscal Expenditure Pressure and Local Non-tax Revenue Growth [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2014 (05): 27-38.
[5]
Tong Jinzhi, Li Xing and Wang Jiajie. Fiscal Decentralization, Multi-level Government Competition and Local Government Non-tax Revenue -- Based on Estimation of Provincial Spatial Dynamic Panel Model [J]. Journal of Social Sciences, Jilin University, 2013, 53 (06): 33-42.
[6]
Wang Zhigang & Gong Liutang. Fiscal Decentralization and Local Government Non-tax Revenue: Based on Provincial Financial Data [J]. World Economic Papers, 2009 (05): 17-38.
[7]
Zhu Wenying, Zhang Hao and Wang Xiaoli. Analysis on Internalization Strategy of Logistics External Cost [J]. Business Times, 2012 (24): 37-38.
[8]
Lv Bingyang & Guo Qingwang. The Source of Rapid Tax Growth in China: Interpretation under the Framework of Tax Capability and Taxation Effort [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2011 (02): 76-90+221-222.
[9]
Keen. M., C. Kotsogiannis. Does Federalism Lead to Excessively High Taxes? [J]. American Economic Review, No. 9, 2002.
[10]
Long Xiaoning & Zhu Yanli et al. Empirical Analysis of Tax Competition among County Governments in China Based on Spatial Econometric Model [J]. Economic Research, 2014 (8).
[11]
Meng Qingyong. Research on Financial Charging System in China [D]. Jilin University, 2005.
[12]
Sun Wenji. Analysis of the Status Quo and Reasons of Charges in China [J]. Journal of Suzhou University, 1999 (02): 33-36.
[13]
Fan Ziying. The merger of state and local taxes will have a profound impact on local economy and government action [N]. China Economic Times, 2018-05-31 (005).
[14]
Lv Wei & Gao Shuaixiong. Housing Price Fluctuations, Land Finance and China's macroeconomics [J]. Comparison of Economic & Social Systems, 2016 (4).
[15]
Li Yihua. Research on Problem of Government Non-tax Revenue and Strengthening Budget Management [J]. Economic Research Reference, 2018 (28): 3-19.
[16]
Shu Hongtao. Contract Management of PPP Toll Road by Using the Cooperation between Government and Social Capital [J]. China Market, 2018 (26): 102-10.
[17]
Wu Jingzhou. Research on the Governance of Institutional Transaction Cost [J]. Price of Commodities in China, 2018 (03): 3-7.
[18]
Xu Xiuchuan. Empirical Research on Interaction between Urbanization, Industrialization and Urban-Rural Income Gap [J]. Agricultural Economic Issues, 2008 (12).
Browse journals by subject