Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach

Received: 29 September 2025     Accepted: 12 November 2025     Published: 19 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Floating interest Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a moderately risky financial asset. Given the risks involved and the returns attached, a rational investor has to determine the optimal allocation of wealth to the CBDC in his or her portfolio. The paper sought to establish the optimal wealth allocation to a floating interest rate CBDC and a risk-free asset. The study adopted an analytical design to illustrate the theoretical optimal holding of floating interest rate CBDC by individual investors based on Merton's 1969 mathematical model. Using data collected from the Central Bank of Kenya and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, the paper applied the Merton model to a hypothetical proxy for CBDC, and real-world data on inflation, interest, and 91-day T-bill, to allocate investors' wealth to floating interest CBDC and a risk-free asset. The results show that optimal wealth allocation to floating interest rate CBDC was a function of the risk premium, the degree of investor risk aversion and the volatility of the floating interest rate CBDC. The results further demonstrate that whenever CBDC offered a higher interest rate than a risk-free asset, investors would shift wealth to CBDC and vice versa. Further, whenever the volatility on CBDC returns increased, investors tended to hold fewer units of interest-bearing CBDCs and more of risk-free assets and vice versa. The optimal monthly consumption for the risk-averse investor was a function of subjective discounting rate, degree of investor risk aversion and previous wealth. A higher subjective discounting rate or a higher cumulative wealth, or a lower risk aversion was associated with increased optimal consumption, ceteris paribus, and vice versa is true. Our results therefore suggest that financial markets investment portfolios are sensitive to CBDC volatility, and this that can originate another strand of CBDCs literature. These findings provide useful insights to individual and institutional investors, and can guide policymakers and financial market regulators on the important link between CBDC and financial markets in the new digital-currency era. For example, policymakers and regulators can adjust fiscal and monetary policy by considering the possible impact on investor portfolios. This can guide investors to strategically adjust their portfolio positions.

Published in International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14
Page(s) 147-162
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Central Bank Digital Currency, Optimal Wealth Allocation, Investor Portfolio, Risk-Free Asset, Cryptocurrency

References
[1] I. Agur, A. Ari, and G. Dell’Ariccia, ‘Designing central bank digital currencies’, J. Monet. Econ., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 62-79, Jan. 2022,
[2] P. K. Ozili, ‘Central bank digital currency research around the world: a review of literature’, J. Money Laund. Control, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 215-226, Mar. 2023,
[3] A. J. K. Alfar, C. Kumpamool, D. T. K. Nguyen, and R. Ahmed, ‘The determinants of issuing central bank digital currencies’, Res. Int. Bus. Finance, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 101884, Jan. 2023,
[4] M. F. Hellwig, ‘Safe assets, risky assets, and dynamic inefficiency in overlapping-generations economies’, MPI Collect. Goods Discuss. Pap. vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-55, 2021.
[5] T. Keister and D. Sanches, ‘Should Central Banks Issue Digital Currency?’ Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 404-431, Jan. 2023,
[6] S. Ozturkcan, K. Senel, and M. Ozdinc, ‘Framing the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) revolution’, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 462-479, Apr. 2025,
[7] R. Auer and R. Böhme, ‘Central bank digital currency: the quest for minimally invasive technology’, Bank for International Settlements, 2021.
[8] M. D. Bordo and A. T. Levin, Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. Cambridge, MA: NBER publications, 2017.
[9] T. Ahnert, P. Hoffmann, A. Leonello, and D. Porcellacchia, Central bank digital currency and financial stability. European Central Bank, 2023.
[10] T. Adrian and T. Mancini-Griffoli, ‘The Rise of Digital Money’, Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57-77, Nov. 2021,
[11] M. Demertzis and C. Martins, ‘Progress with the digital euro’, Intereconomics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 195-200, 2023,
[12] M. E. Filippin, ‘The Macroeconomics of Digital Money: Household Adoption, Bank Intermediation, and Monetary Policy’, Doctoral Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2025.
[13] J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, 1953.
[14] D. Bernoulli, ‘Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk’, in The Kelly capital growth investment criterion: Theory and practice, World Scientific, 2011, pp. 11-24.
[15] H. M. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Yale University Press, 2008.
[16] R. C. Merton, ‘Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case’, Rev. Econ. Stat., vol. 51, no. 3, p. 247, Aug. 1969,
[17] D. Andolfatto, ‘Assessing the Impact of Central Bank Digital Currency on Private Banks’, Econ. J., vol. 131, no. 634, pp. 525-540, Mar. 2021,
[18] M. K. Brunnermeier and D. Niepelt, ‘On the equivalence of private and public money’, J. Monet. Econ., vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 27-41, Oct. 2019,
[19] A. Belke and E. Beretta, ‘From cash to central bank digital currencies and cryptocurrencies: a balancing act between modernity and monetary stability’, J. Econ. Stud., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 911-938, June 2020,
[20] K. Rogoff and J. Scazzero, ‘Covid Cash’, Cato J., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 571-592, 2021.
[21] M. Lloyd, ‘The Future of Money: Central Bank Digital Currencies’, Atl. Econ. J., vol. 50, no. 3-4, pp. 85-98, Dec. 2022,
[22] V. V. Osadchii, A. L. Zolkin, O. P. Shevchenko, I. A. Poskryakov, and N. F. Zavialova, ‘Methodology and principles of assets allocation’, SHS Web Conf., vol. 128, no. 1, p. 04006, 2021,
[23] A. Lippi, S. Rossi, and M. G. Soana, ‘Status quo bias and risk tolerance in asset allocation decision-making’, J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 195-209, 2022,
[24] J. Liu, Y. Cheng, X. Li, and S. Sriboonchitta, ‘The Role of Risk Forecast and Risk Tolerance in Portfolio Management: A Case Study of the Chinese Financial Sector’, Axioms, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 134, Mar. 2022,
[25] J. Antwi and C. B. Naanwaab, ‘Generational Differences, Risk Tolerance, and Ownership of Financial Securities: Evidence from the United States’, Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 35, May 2022,
[26] Z. Yao and A. G. Rabbani, ‘Association between investment risk tolerance and portfolio risk: The role of confidence level’, J. Behav. Exp. Finance, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 100482, June 2021,
[27] R. S. J. Koijen, R. J. Richmond, and M. Yogo, ‘Which Investors Matter for Equity Valuations and Expected Returns?’, Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 2387-2424, July 2024,
[28] S. Kozak, ‘Dynamics of Bond and Stock Returns’, J. Monet. Econ., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 188-209, 2021,
[29] Z. Lv, A. M. Y. Chu, W. K. Wong, and T. C. Chiang, ‘The maximum-return-and-minimum-volatility effect: evidence from choosing risky and riskless assets to form a portfolio’, Risk Manage., vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 97-122, June 2021,
[30] T. Asano and Y. Osaki, ‘Portfolio allocation problems between risky and ambiguous assets’, Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 284, no. 1, pp. 63-79, Jan. 2020,
[31] J. Y. Campbell, A. W. Lo, A. C. MacKinlay, and R. F. Whitelaw, ‘The econometrics of financial markets’, Macroecon. Dyn., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 559-562, Dec. 1998,
[32] D. Duffie, Dynamic asset pricing theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
[33] D. A. Otieno, R. W. Ngugi, and N. H. W. Wawire, ‘Effects of Interest Rate on Stock Market Returns in Kenya’, Int. J. Econ. Finance, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 40, July 2017,
[34] J. Y. Campbell and R. J. Shiller, ‘Stock Prices, Earnings, and Expected Dividends’, J. Finance, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 661-676, July 1988,
[35] R. Garratt and H. Zhu, ‘On Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency with Heterogeneous Banks’, Working Paper, 2021. Accessed: Oct. 29, 2025. Available:
[36] BIS, ‘CBDCs: Financial Stability Implications.’, Bank for International Settlements, Technical Paper No. 117, 2021.
[37] IMF, ‘Interest-bearing CBDCs: Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Implications’, International Monetary Fund, Policy Paper, 2023.
[38] BIS, ‘The Future Monetary System’, Bank for International Settlements, 2022.
[39] R. Auer, J. Frost, L. Gambacorta, C. Monnet, T. Rice, and H. S. Shin, ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies: Motives, Economic Implications, and the Research Frontier’, Annu. Rev. Econ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 697-721, Aug. 2022,
[40] M. Kumhof and C. Noone, ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies - Design Principles and Balance Sheet Implications’, Bank of England, Working Paper 725, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 28, 2025. Available:
[41] J. H. Cochrane, ‘The risk and return of venture capital’, J. Financ. Econ., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 3-52, Jan. 2005,
[42] R. Mehra and E. C. Prescott, ‘The equity premium: A puzzle’, J. Monet. Econ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145-161, Mar. 1985,
[43] L. G. Epstein and S. E. Zin, ‘“First-order” risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle’, J. Monet. Econ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 387-407, Dec. 1990,
[44] R. C. Merton, ‘Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Mode’, in Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Elsevier, 1975, pp. 621-661.
[45] P. A. Samuelson, ‘Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming’, in Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Elsevier, 1975, pp. 517-524.
[46] J. Y. Campbell and L. M. Viceira, Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-term Investors. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Obuya, M. O., Onyuma, S. O. (2025). Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 11(6), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Obuya, M. O.; Onyuma, S. O. Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach. Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2025, 11(6), 147-162. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Obuya MO, Onyuma SO. Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach. Int J Finance Bank Res. 2025;11(6):147-162. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14,
      author = {Michael Ochieng Obuya and Samuel Owino Onyuma},
      title = {Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach},
      journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research},
      volume = {11},
      number = {6},
      pages = {147-162},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20251106.14},
      abstract = {Floating interest Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a moderately risky financial asset. Given the risks involved and the returns attached, a rational investor has to determine the optimal allocation of wealth to the CBDC in his or her portfolio. The paper sought to establish the optimal wealth allocation to a floating interest rate CBDC and a risk-free asset. The study adopted an analytical design to illustrate the theoretical optimal holding of floating interest rate CBDC by individual investors based on Merton's 1969 mathematical model. Using data collected from the Central Bank of Kenya and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, the paper applied the Merton model to a hypothetical proxy for CBDC, and real-world data on inflation, interest, and 91-day T-bill, to allocate investors' wealth to floating interest CBDC and a risk-free asset. The results show that optimal wealth allocation to floating interest rate CBDC was a function of the risk premium, the degree of investor risk aversion and the volatility of the floating interest rate CBDC. The results further demonstrate that whenever CBDC offered a higher interest rate than a risk-free asset, investors would shift wealth to CBDC and vice versa. Further, whenever the volatility on CBDC returns increased, investors tended to hold fewer units of interest-bearing CBDCs and more of risk-free assets and vice versa. The optimal monthly consumption for the risk-averse investor was a function of subjective discounting rate, degree of investor risk aversion and previous wealth. A higher subjective discounting rate or a higher cumulative wealth, or a lower risk aversion was associated with increased optimal consumption, ceteris paribus, and vice versa is true. Our results therefore suggest that financial markets investment portfolios are sensitive to CBDC volatility, and this that can originate another strand of CBDCs literature. These findings provide useful insights to individual and institutional investors, and can guide policymakers and financial market regulators on the important link between CBDC and financial markets in the new digital-currency era. For example, policymakers and regulators can adjust fiscal and monetary policy by considering the possible impact on investor portfolios. This can guide investors to strategically adjust their portfolio positions.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Optimal Wealth Allocation to Interest-Bearing Central Bank Digital Currency in Investor Portfolios: A Merton Model Approach
    AU  - Michael Ochieng Obuya
    AU  - Samuel Owino Onyuma
    Y1  - 2025/12/19
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14
    T2  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JF  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JO  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    SP  - 147
    EP  - 162
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-2278
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20251106.14
    AB  - Floating interest Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a moderately risky financial asset. Given the risks involved and the returns attached, a rational investor has to determine the optimal allocation of wealth to the CBDC in his or her portfolio. The paper sought to establish the optimal wealth allocation to a floating interest rate CBDC and a risk-free asset. The study adopted an analytical design to illustrate the theoretical optimal holding of floating interest rate CBDC by individual investors based on Merton's 1969 mathematical model. Using data collected from the Central Bank of Kenya and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, the paper applied the Merton model to a hypothetical proxy for CBDC, and real-world data on inflation, interest, and 91-day T-bill, to allocate investors' wealth to floating interest CBDC and a risk-free asset. The results show that optimal wealth allocation to floating interest rate CBDC was a function of the risk premium, the degree of investor risk aversion and the volatility of the floating interest rate CBDC. The results further demonstrate that whenever CBDC offered a higher interest rate than a risk-free asset, investors would shift wealth to CBDC and vice versa. Further, whenever the volatility on CBDC returns increased, investors tended to hold fewer units of interest-bearing CBDCs and more of risk-free assets and vice versa. The optimal monthly consumption for the risk-averse investor was a function of subjective discounting rate, degree of investor risk aversion and previous wealth. A higher subjective discounting rate or a higher cumulative wealth, or a lower risk aversion was associated with increased optimal consumption, ceteris paribus, and vice versa is true. Our results therefore suggest that financial markets investment portfolios are sensitive to CBDC volatility, and this that can originate another strand of CBDCs literature. These findings provide useful insights to individual and institutional investors, and can guide policymakers and financial market regulators on the important link between CBDC and financial markets in the new digital-currency era. For example, policymakers and regulators can adjust fiscal and monetary policy by considering the possible impact on investor portfolios. This can guide investors to strategically adjust their portfolio positions.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections