| Peer-Reviewed

Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28)

Received: 2 February 2021    Accepted: 9 February 2021    Published: 26 January 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

During the European unification process, they stated the need for drawing up a common energy strategic plan that will affects electricity production system in terms of infrastructure, production and generation. The EU strategic action plans included; reduction in emissions, an increase in renewable energies, energy efficiency. In this light therefore the energy efficiency was booked for researching. This article presents an in-depth study of the challenges in transforming a functioning PMO model to an EPMO model within four electricity companies from different countries within the EU and how those challenges can be address within companies implementing same methodology to bring about electricity production efficiency. Will these identified challenges make it impossible for the companies to achieve electricity production efficiency in the transformation from PMO to EPMO? PMO has been the major methodology used by these companies. To achieve production efficiency, the need for a heavyweight methodology was identified (EPMO) and implemented in four mega electricity producing companies with cross boarder distributions, one from France; Germany; Spain and UK.

Published in International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12
Page(s) 6-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Project Management Office, PMO, Enterprise Project Management Office (EPMO), EPMO Challenges, ANOVA, Efficiency

References
[1] Hobday, M., 2000. The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Res. Pol. 29, 871–893.
[2] Hill, G. M., 2014. The Complete Project Management Office Handbook. CRC Press, Florida USA.
[3] Hobbs, B., Aubry, M., 2010. The Project Management Office (PMO): a Quest for Understanding. PMI, Pennsylvania.
[4] Powell, M., Young, J., 2007. The project management support office. In: Morris, P., Pinto, J. (Eds.), The Wiley Guide to Project Control. Wiley, Canada.
[5] Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., Turkulainen, V., 2011. The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29, 408–421.
[6] Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Thuillier, D., 2008. Organisational project management: an historical approach to the study of PMOs. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26, 38–43.
[7] Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., 2011. The project management office (PMO): a quest for understanding. Proj. Manag. J. 42 94-94.
[8] Unger, B. N., Gemünden, H. G., Aubry, M., 2012. The three roles of a project portfolio management office: their impact on portfolio management execution and success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30, 608–620.
[9] Stark, J., 2015. Product Lifecycle Management. 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, vol. 1 Springer, New York.
[10] Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., 1995. Product development: past research, present findings, and fu. Academy of Management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 343.
[11] Dekkers, R., Chang, C. M., Kreutzfeldt, J., 2013. The interface between “product design and engineering” and manufacturing: a review of the literature and empirical evidence. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144, 316–333.
[12] Kassel David S. Managing Public Sector Projects: A Strategic Framework for Success in an Era of Downsized Government. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010.
[13] Wirick David W. Public-Sector Project Management: Meeting the Challenges and Achieving Results. Hoboken: Wiley and PMI, 2009.
[14] Burnes, B. (2004) Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics, 4th edn (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
[15] De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2005) Strategy Synthesis: Resolving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage, 2nd edn (London: Thomson Learning).
[16] Crawford, K 2001, The Strategic Project Office: A Guide to Organizational Performance, Centre for Business Practices, New York.
[17] PMI (Project Management Institute) (2012), The Project Management Office In Sync with Strategy. edn, Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, Pa.
[18] PMI (Project Management Institute) (2008), A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 4th ed., Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, Pa.
[19] Kerzner, H 2009, Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, 10th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N. J.
[20] Amulya Gurtu, 2010; Enterprise Project Management, PMI Virtual Library.
[21] Arvind Rathore 2010; Wipro Technologies, “The growing importance of EPMO (Enterprise Project Management Office) in today’s organizations”.
[22] EPMO Vermont (2013) Enterprise Project Management Office Charter. Enterprise Program Management Office. Montpelier, Vermont, USA.
[23] Terry Courtney 13 Feb 2020, EPMO vs. PMO – The Differences, Pros, and Cons.
[24] Dai CX. The role of the project management office in achieving project success. Dissertation, The George Washington University; 2002.
[25] An Oracle White PaperJuly; 2010, The Enterprise PMO Drives Long-Term Business Value forthe Aerospace and Defense Industry.
[26] Moira Alexander, 2018; What is an EPMO? The organizational key to project success, https://www.cio.com/article/3277972/epmo-enterprise-project-management-office-explained.html (accessed 30 January 2020).
[27] PMI (2008); Project Management Institute, A guide to project management body of knowledge, 4th ed., 2008).
[28] M. Aubry, B. Hobbs, R. Müller, T. Blomquist, 2011; Identifying the Forces Driving Frequent Change in PMOs, Project Management Institute, 2011.
[29] B. Hobbs, M. Aubry, A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): the results of Phase 1. Project Management Journal 38 (1), 2007, pp. 74–86.
[30] Juttner, U., Christopher, M. C. and Baker, S. (2007), “Demand chain management: integrating marketing and supply chain management”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 377-92.
[31] Hilletofth, P., Ericsson, D., Christopher, M. (2009), “Demand chain management: a Swedish industrial case study”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 109 No. 9, pp. 1179–1195.
[32] Robert Handler el Gartner 2020; PMO Evolution for Digital Primer for 2020, Published: 24 January 2020.
[33] Kitchenham and Charters,(2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ekomenzoge Metuge, José Ramón Otegi Olaso. (2022). Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28). International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 8(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ekomenzoge Metuge; José Ramón Otegi Olaso. Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28). Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2022, 8(1), 6-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ekomenzoge Metuge, José Ramón Otegi Olaso. Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28). Int J Finance Bank Res. 2022;8(1):6-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12,
      author = {Ekomenzoge Metuge and José Ramón Otegi Olaso},
      title = {Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28)},
      journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {6-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20220801.12},
      abstract = {During the European unification process, they stated the need for drawing up a common energy strategic plan that will affects electricity production system in terms of infrastructure, production and generation. The EU strategic action plans included; reduction in emissions, an increase in renewable energies, energy efficiency. In this light therefore the energy efficiency was booked for researching. This article presents an in-depth study of the challenges in transforming a functioning PMO model to an EPMO model within four electricity companies from different countries within the EU and how those challenges can be address within companies implementing same methodology to bring about electricity production efficiency. Will these identified challenges make it impossible for the companies to achieve electricity production efficiency in the transformation from PMO to EPMO? PMO has been the major methodology used by these companies. To achieve production efficiency, the need for a heavyweight methodology was identified (EPMO) and implemented in four mega electricity producing companies with cross boarder distributions, one from France; Germany; Spain and UK.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Operational Challenges, from PMO to EPMO Execution and Operation Case Study Within Electricity Producing Companies (Four Selected Companies Within EU28)
    AU  - Ekomenzoge Metuge
    AU  - José Ramón Otegi Olaso
    Y1  - 2022/01/26
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12
    T2  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JF  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JO  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-2278
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20220801.12
    AB  - During the European unification process, they stated the need for drawing up a common energy strategic plan that will affects electricity production system in terms of infrastructure, production and generation. The EU strategic action plans included; reduction in emissions, an increase in renewable energies, energy efficiency. In this light therefore the energy efficiency was booked for researching. This article presents an in-depth study of the challenges in transforming a functioning PMO model to an EPMO model within four electricity companies from different countries within the EU and how those challenges can be address within companies implementing same methodology to bring about electricity production efficiency. Will these identified challenges make it impossible for the companies to achieve electricity production efficiency in the transformation from PMO to EPMO? PMO has been the major methodology used by these companies. To achieve production efficiency, the need for a heavyweight methodology was identified (EPMO) and implemented in four mega electricity producing companies with cross boarder distributions, one from France; Germany; Spain and UK.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain

  • University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain

  • Sections